--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part 2. RLM - Picking a criteria.
Ok, you have found a few RLMs for this week, and need to
decide which ones are of value.
My personal criteria for a good RLM are:
- RLM of
1.0 or greater for spreads of 0 to +/- 16.0
- RLM of
1.5 or greater for spreads greater
than 16.0.
- The
percentage of public bets are less than 30% with a minimum of 8000 bets.
- The
RLM is a home team.
If any of these criteria are not met, then the
RLM team needs to be handicapped further before making a bet on that team.
Obviously, as the criteria gets better, the value of the RLM
gets better (eg. RLM of 2.5, 15% bet and the team is at home. What this RLM represents is the classic
"fade the public, take the home dog;" however, the best thing of this
particular RLM bet is that you are taking the Vegas bookmaker's side of the bet
(for an explanation why, see the first of the posts on this series on RLMs.
Let's take a look at this week's NFL games:
Today (10/20/09) the potential RLMs are:
(source:
http://www.thespread.com/nfl-football-public-betting-chart)
NFL:
Oakland Raiders:
24% bet (out of 1689 bets)
+7 (opening line) to +6 (current line) : RLM = (7-6) = 1.0
Dallas Cowboys:
29% bet (out of 2624 bets)
-3 (opening line) to -4 (current line): RLM = ((-3) - (-4))
= 1.0
Dallas and Oakland would make good RLMs based on public bet
percentages and the fact that both teams are playing at home. The problem is that there are still too few
number of bets made with these (and all the other NFL) games to date. For the RLMs to be justified, I feel, at
least 8000 bets need to be made with these games. Why? Because there can still be large percentage swings with
larger number of people betting later in the week.
Although the concept of a Reverse Line Move still exists
with these fewer number of bets, the relative small sampling number makes me
uncomfortable calling it a RLM.
Ultimately the linesmakers can still shift the lines, and they
themselves can cancel the RLM with a line change at any moment. If the number of people bet are greater than
8000, and the line still indicates an RLM, then I can feel relatively
comfortable that the RLM exists. You
can argue that the number of bets corresponds to a sample size, and the larger
the sample size, the larger the probability of the RLM occurring, even if the
line reverts the game to a non-RLM.
Thus, the 8000 bet number is a personal preference, and you
can take the betting (sample) size to be whatever you want it to be.
You can even make the required bet size larger (say 10,000
bets).
The only criteria that are not negotable are the 40% of public bets on a team and the line changing from a negative vale to a more negative vale or the line moving from a postive number to a smaller value. If the percentage of public bets are greater than 40%, by definition this is not a Reverse Line Move, and you are betting the game based on something else. The line shifts are the ultimate definiton of a RLM.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a series of blogs regarding Reverse Line
Movements.
The foundation of these blogs are from:
http://ltprofits.mysbrforum.com/blog...g-profits.html
The data and free line movements will be mainly from these sites:
http://www.thespread.com/ncaa-colleg...-betting-chart
http://www.thespread.com/nfl-footbal...-betting-chart
and SBRlines.